Draft version 1.7 beta — Revised October 31, 2026
← Return to the table in Chapter 4, § 5
Nonretention of data records
A topic page linked from Chapter 4, § 5, Examples of Reported Violations of Enforceable Ethics Codes.
Definition
Non-retention of data records occurs when the documents or specimens that would enable an independent investigator to reproduce an analysis are no longer available. "Non-retention" means some or all of these records have been discarded, or if they still exist they are in a state that renders them useless. In a laboratory analysis, the necessary records might include paper or digital records of, for example, an X-ray diffractometer's analytical output for a given specimen, along with the record of the most recent machine calibration would also be useful to someone auditing the results.
The goal is to retain information related to the primary data and the subsequent analysis so it could be fully audited and substantially reproduced if necessary to verify or validate the process and results. A typical critiique of scientific data might involve the central value of each datum as well as the uncertainty around that central value. Without sufficient preserved data records, neither the central values or their uncertainties can be independently evaluated.
In my work, the final report or publication is just one product of the research. I try to document the source of all primary data, exactly how the data were used in the analysis, the computational codes I developed or adopted for the analysis, the commercial or open-source software that was used (name, version, publisher, etc.), graphics codes or software used to generate the key graphics, and so forth. That documentary record is saved as an archive. The most likely use of this archive is as the seed of a future project that expands upon or refines the original project, or of a new project that will use the same process.
If the data records are not retained, there is no proof that the analysis and results are anything but the product of the imagination of a person or team regarding some aspect of how a world might work in some parallel universe. But true science is used to characterize reality, not to construct fantasies. The preserved data record is the necessary ingredient in any review process to test whether the work was done as reported.
Relevant provisions in geoethics codes
AAPG – § X; AEG – § X; AGI – § X; AGU – § X; AIPG – § X; ASBOG – § X; CAL – § X; GSA – § X.
Code Abbreviations
- AAPG — American Association of Petroleum Geologists, AAPG Code of Ethics (2024), Link to current document
- AEG — Association of Environmental and Engineering Geologists, AEG Code of Conduct (2018), Link to current document
- AGI — American Geosciences Institute, AGI Guidelines for Ethical Professional Conduct (2015), Link to current document
- AGU — American Geophysical Union, AGU Scientific Integrity and Professional Ethics (2023), Link to current document
- AIPG — American Institute of Professional Geologists, AIPG Code of Ethics (2019), Link to current document
- ASBOG — Association of State Boards of Geology, Model Rules and Regulations, Section 16, Code of Ethics (2019), Link to current document; see pages 27 to 29.
- Cal — Regulations Relating to the Practices of Geology and Geophysics, California Code of Regulations, Title 16, Division 29, Section 3065, Professional Standards and Code of Professional Conduct – Professional Geology and Professional Geophysics (2026), Link to current document; see pages 30 to 33.
- GSA — Geological Society of America, GSA Code of Ethics & Professional Conduct (2023), Link to current document