Geologic Time


The URL of this web page is http://bearspace.baylor.edu/Vince_Cronin/www/PhysGeol/GeolTimeNotes.html
Revised October 20, 2008

Note the thumbnail sketch of Earth History available at http://bearspace.baylor.edu/Vince_Cronin/www/PhysGeol/EarthHist.html, and refer to the answers to frequently-asked questions at the Baylor Geology Department web site: http://www.baylor.edu/Geology


Some Frequently Asked Questions about geologic time
and the evolution of life on Earth

Q: Don't all true Christians believe that Earth and all the rest of creation is ~6000 years old?
A: No. For example, the Catholic Church and most main-line Protestant denominations do not teach young-Earth creationism. As the leader of the world's largest Christian organization, Pope John Paul II, told the Pontifical Academy of Sciences in 1981 (Cosmology and Fundamental Physics),
"Cosmogony and cosmology have always aroused great interest among peoples and religions. The Bible itself speaks to us of the origin of the universe and its make-up, not in order to provide us with a scientific treatise, but in order to state the correct relationships of man with God and with the universe. Sacred Scripture wishes simply to declare that the world was created by God, and in order to teach this truth it expresses itself in the terms of the cosmology in use at the time of the writer. The Sacred Book likewise wishes to tell men that the world was not created as the seat of the gods, as was taught by other cosmogonies and cosmologies, but was rather created for the service of man and the glory of God. Any other teaching about the origin and make-up of the universe is alien to the intentions of the Bible, which does not wish to teach how heaven was made but how one goes to heaven."
It is difficult to answer this type of question in general, because of the embedded assertion that some people can be classified as true or authentic Christians while others are not true/authentic Christians. That is not an issue that requires input from science.

Q: Don't all Christians believe that all types of organisms, including humans, were specially created at the same time?
A: No. See the previous response.

Q: Don't all Christians believe that Darwinian evolution is a secular, atheistic theory that is inconsistent with Christianity?
A: No. For example, evolutionary biology is taught at all Catholic universities that have biology departments, to my knowledge. The science of evolution has also been taught at Baylor for about a century, according to the Dean of the College of Arts and Science.

Q: Isn't evolution just a theory, no better or worse than any other?
A: No.

  1. That organisms evolve over time is a reproducibly observed fact. The theoretical aspect of the problem involves how evolution occurs, not whether it occurs.
  2. A scientific theory is a specific testable explanation of how scientific facts relate to one another that has been tested and has not been falsified/disproven.
    This is a much more specific and restricted definition of the word theory than is used by the non-scientific general public, for whom a theory is the same as a guess.
    A scientific theory is significantly more reliable than a speculative or unsubstantiated idea that has not withstood rigorous testing, no matter how clever the speculation may be.

Q: Isn't it true that the dinosaurs are still alive, but they live in uninhabited places like the deep jungles of Africa?
A: No. With the exception of birds and crocodilians, dinosaurs were extinct by the end of the Cretaceous Period, 65 million years ago. Modern humans (Homo sapiens) first appear in the fossil record around 250 thousand years ago, missing coexistence with dinosaurs by almost 65 million years.

Q: Isn't it true that there are human footprints in the same sedimentary layers as dinosaur footprints, proving that humans and dinosaurs lived together?
A: No.
Sometimes "human footprints" are manufactured in a dinosaur trackway using acid or chisles, but these frauds are rather easily exposed. Sometimes, the upper layer of the footprint of a "3-toed" theropod dinosaur is eroded, removing the more shallow imprints of the toes and leaving the deeper imprint of the dinosaur's foot. Some people who are not vertebrate paleontologists have mistaken these eroded imprints as human footprints, even though they lack the size or shape of human feet.
No fossils of modern humans have been reported in strata of between 65 million to around 250 thousand years in age, and no dinosaur fossils (other than birds or crocodilians) have been found in strata of less than 65 million years in age. Dinosaurs and humans did not live at the same time.

Q: Isn't it true that many scientists think that Darwin's theory of evolution is not correct?
A: No, but this is a misleading question on several fronts.

  1. While some scientists (and some non-scientists who call themselves scientists) are not convinced by the evidence that Darwin was substantially correct, a very very significant majority are convinced. The largest list of self-identified scientists who do not accept the basic ideas of Darwinian evolution that I have seen has around 500 names on it, including many who would not be objectively considered scientists or people with advanced knowledge of biology or paleobiology (e.g., lawyers, engineers, etc.) In contrast, Project Steve has thus far collected the endorsement of 972 scientists named Steve (or some variant thereof) who have endorsed a basic statement of Darwinian evolution. That statement follows:
    "Evolution is a vital, well-supported, unifying principle of the biological sciences, and the scientific evidence is overwhelmingly in favor of the idea that all living things share a common ancestry. Although there are legitimate debates about the patterns and processes of evolution, there is no serious scientific doubt that evolution occurred or that natural selection is a major mechanism in its occurrence. It is scientifically inappropriate and pedagogically irresponsible for creationist pseudoscience, including but not limited to "intelligent design," to be introduced into the science curricula of our nation's public schools."
    It is estimated that around 1% of scientists have the first name Steve. From this, one might infer that perhaps 99% of living scientists accept the basic ideas of Darwinian evolution.
    It is probably more relevant to ask how many scientists working in fields that would give them an expert's knowledge of the issue are convinced that Darwinian evolution is substantially valid. My guess is that the acceptance level among scientists with appropriate expertise (biologists, paleobiologists, paleontologists, geologists) is nearly unanimous.
  2. Current models of biological evolution include many (but not all) of Darwin's ideas, along with more recent ideas based on molecular biology, genetics, evolutionary developmental biology, and so on. Evolutionary theory does not begin and end with Darwin and his work.
  3. You should refer to the Baylor Biology Department's "statement on evolution" on their web site: http://www.baylor.edu/Biology. It states:
    "Evolution, a foundational principle of modern biology, is supported by overwhelming scientific evidence and is accepted by the vast majority of scientists. Because it is fundamental to the understanding of modern biology, the faculty in the Biology Department at Baylor University, Waco, TX, teach evolution throughout the biology curriculum. We are in accordance with the American Association for Advancement of Science's statement on evolution. We are a science department, so we do not teach alternative hypotheses or philosophically deduced theories that cannot be tested rigorously."

Q: Isn't it true that fossils are direct evidence of a worldwide flood: Noah's flood?
A: No. There is no geological evidence that the entire Earth has been flooded during the time that modern humans (Homo sapiens) have been on Earth: within the last 250 thousand years. Fossils range in age from around 3.5 billion years to less than 1 million years -- they were not all deposited at once.

Q: How old is the Earth?
A: Earth is around 4.5 to 4.6 billion years old. For more information and references, see the response to this question posted by the Baylor Geology Department via the FAQ section of its web site http://www.baylor.edu/Geology.

Q: How old is the universe?
A: The current best estimate for the age of the universe is ~13.7 billion years. For more information and references, see the response to this question posted by the Baylor Geology Department via the FAQ section of its web site http://www.baylor.edu/Geology.

Q: Are the decay constants used in isotopic dating actually constant, or do they vary over time naturally or in response to external forces?
A: With rare well-documented exceptions, the decay constants for radioactive isotopes used in geological dating are actually quite constant. For more information and references, see the response to this question posted by the Baylor Geology Department via the FAQ section of its web site http://www.baylor.edu/Geology.

Q: What is a fossil?
A: A fossil is evidence of prior life that is preserved in the rock record. There are many types of fossils, including petrified bones and shells, casts, imprints, and chemical markers. For more information and references, see the response to this question posted by the Baylor Geology Department via the FAQ section of its web site http://www.baylor.edu/Geology.

Q: How old are the oldest fossils?
A: The oldest unambiguous fossils are around 3.5 billion years old, although there are some chemical indicators of life in rock dated at ~3.8 billion years. For more information and references, see the response to this question posted by the Baylor Geology Department via the FAQ section of its web site http://www.baylor.edu/Geology.

Q: What are mass extinctions, and when have they occurred?
A: Mass extinctions are situations in which a very large number of types of organisms become extinct over a very short time period. Around 5 great mass extinctions have been recognized during the past 600 million years. For more information and references, see the response to this question posted by the Baylor Geology Department via the FAQ section of its web site http://www.baylor.edu/Geology.

Q: Does the fossil record support the idea of biological change over time (biological evolution)?
A: Yes, abundantly. For more information and references, see the response to this question posted by the Baylor Geology Department via the FAQ section of its web site http://www.baylor.edu/Geology.


  1. Our personal concepts of time are scaled by how long we have been alive, extended by the transmitted memories of the older people with whom we have interacted and, in a less direct manner, by books and other cultural artifacts. We are most comfortable with the time interval since we were ~3 years old -- the time of personal remembrance.
  2. Fossil remnants of Homo sapiens date from ~250 ka BP (250,000 years before present)
    (Information from C.B. Stringer, 2001, Dating the origin of modern humans: Geological Society of London, Special Publication 190, p. 265-274.)
  3. Geologists use a variety of techniques to establish the time order of geological events -- so-called "relative dating"
  4. The geologic time scale was initially developed based on fossil evidence, with divisions that generally represent significant changes in fossil assemblages. Many if not all of the divisions are now known to represent extinction events or significant environmental/climatological changes. The geologic time scale was initially developed using relative dating techniques. Thanks to the work of Arthur Holmes of the University of Edinburg (who is your academic great-grandfather through Cronin and his teacher Donald McIntyre) and the advent of isotopic dating techniques, the ages (in years) of the various geological time periods began to be established in the 1920s.
    Note: Ga = billion years = 1,000,000,000 years; Ma = million years
    1. The length of geologic time scales
      1. How much is a million?
        • If I walk 1 mile every 20 minutes, it would take me approximately 38 years to walk 1 million miles.
        • If the length of geologic time is compared to a football field, Precambrian time represents the first 87 yards, and all events since the beginning of the Paleozoic are compressed into the last 13 yards. Dinosaurs first appeared 5 yards from the goal line. The glacial epoch occurred in the last inch, and historic time is so short that is only as long as the thickness of the last blade of grass before the goal line.
      2. How old is Earth?
        1. Early estimates
          1. Anglican Archbishop Ussher of Ireland (circa 1660): Creation started on October 23, 4004 BC -- based on analysis of time as referenced in the Bible
          2. Lord Kelvin (William Thompson) circa 1862: Earth and the Sun formed between 25 and 400 million years ago
          3. Clarence King (circa 1893): Earth's crust is 25 million years old (1893)
          4. John Joly (circa 1899): Earth is ~90 to 100 million years old, based upon the salinity of the oceans
          5. Bertram Boltwood at Yale (circa 1907): Earth is 2 billion years old
          6. Arthur Holmes (circa 1927): similar to current estimates -- ~4.5 billion years old
          7. Claire Patterson (1953, 1956): ~4.55 billion years
        2. Types of evidence available:
          1. Radiometric dates from rock on Earth (oldest zircon U-Pb ages ~4.4 Ga (Wilde et al., 2001); oldest rocks, 3.96 Ga; lead ages of ~4.55 Ga (Patterson, 1953, 1956))
          2. Radiometric dates from rock on Moon (4.51-4.56 Ga, (Halliday and Lee, 1999; Alibert et al., 1994; Hanan and Tilton, 1987))
          3. Radiometric dates from chondritic meteorites (4.566 Ga)
        3. Current best estimate: just over 4.5 to 4.56 billion years (Dalrymple, 2001; Hofman, 2001)
    2. Absolute dating
      1. Radioactive decay: spontaneous changes in the nuclei of large, unstable isotopes
        1. Half life: time it takes for half a given amount of the isotope to decay into its daughter isotope
          half life = ( (ln(0.5)) / lambda),
          where ln (0.5) = 0.693 = natural logarithm of 1/2
          lambda = the decay constant (ratio of number of atoms decaying each second to the number present)
        2. If the original number of atoms is No, the number of atoms ( N ) remaining after a time interval t will be
          N = No * [ e raised to the power (lambda * t )]
          where e is the natural number ( e = 2.718...). If a mineral contains a radioactive isotope (for instance, 238U), its age can be established by measuring the number of 238U atoms present (N238U) as well as the number of atoms of 206Pb (N206Pb), which is the isotope into which 238U commonly decays by successive a emissions and b decays. The two numbers (N238U + N206Pb) added give No, the number of atoms of 238U originally present. Since lambda is known, the equation can be solved for t, which is the age of the mineral (from Emiliani, 1988).
      2. Useful Radioactive Isotopes Used To Date Rocks
        Note: Ga = billion years = 1,000,000,000 years; Ma = million years
        IsotopeHalf-LifeDaughter
        40K1.25 Ga40Ar
        238U4.47 Ga206Pb
        235U704 Ma207Pb
        232Th14.0 Ga208Pb
        87Rb48.8 Ga87Sr
        14C5730 years14N
  5. The list of dates you should commit to memory for this course (thus far):
  6. Some notes from the history of life on Earth
  7. Some key events in the history of the human family tree, based on the fossil record

Resources concerning geologic time and evolution, maintained by WGBH Public Television of Boston.

Resources concerning evolution, maintained by the Geological Society of America (the largest association of geologists in the world).

National Center for Science Education


Some references and recommended reading:
(Also refer to the separate list of recommended books for your continuing education about science, geology, and life on Earth.)


Let's look at a thumbnail sketch of Earth history!

This Web document and the original material contained in it are copyright (© 2002-2008) by Vince Cronin, and may be used with attribution for non-profit educational and research purposes.


Course Homepage Lab Homepage Email to Cronin